Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Saki Imamura vs Amelia Bissett Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Imamura vs Bissett analysis and find out who is favored!
Saki Imamura vs Amelia Bissett Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Imamura 1 - 0 Bissett
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Imamura has won 47.95% of points on their second serve, while Bissett has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Imamura, in recent form, has won 57.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bissett has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.32% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Imamura has saved 54.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bissett has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Imamura has won 59.38% of matches played (W/L 38/ 26), with Bissett winning 64.29% (W/L 9/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Imamura has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 97/ 63), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Bissett has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 23/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Imamura has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.83% of matches (W/L 28/ 25), where as Bissett has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 9/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Imamura winning 1 times and Bissett being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Imamura winning 2 and Bissett winning 0. The last match between Imamura and Bissett was at the W25 Roehampton, 06-08-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Saki Imamura getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Imamura and Bissett have played a deciding set 0 times, with Imamura winning 0 times and Bissett 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Imamura winning 0, and Bissett 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Imamura has played against opponents with an average rank of 263.66 while Bissett has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Imamura has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bissett has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Imamura has converted 48.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bissett has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
417
Rank
405
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
59% (121-84)
Career Total W/L
57% (25-19)
65% (22-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Saki Imamura vs Amelia Bissett For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Imamura VS Bissett
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Saki Imamura | Amelia Bissett |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (37/48) | 59% (34/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (28/37) | 65% (22/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (6/11) | 33% (8/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (28/58) | 29% (14/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Saki Imamura
Player
Amelia Bissett
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Saki Imamura | Amelia Bissett |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (22/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (51/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (425/344) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (22/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 69 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 125 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 307.03 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1391/2232) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (934/1391) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (400/841) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (139/296) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1054/2332) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (12/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (10/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (22/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (21/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (21/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Saki Imamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Saki Imamura
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saki Imamura
Player
Anastasia Grechkina
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Saki Imamura
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Saki Imamura
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Saki Imamura
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Saki Imamura
Player
Rina Saigo
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Saki Imamura
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Saki Imamura
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hong Yi Cody Wong
Player
Saki Imamura
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saki Imamura
Player
Lizette Cabrera
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Amelia Bissett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Saki Imamura
Player
Amelia Bissett
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Iamachkine
Player
Amelia Bissett
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Amelia Bissett
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Lucia Llinares Domingo
74%
(
86 of
117)
1st Serve %
74%
(
76 of
103)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
57 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
103)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Lara Pfeifer
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
83%
(
87 of
105)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Charlotte Russell
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lya Fernandez
Player
Amelia Bissett
79%
(
59 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Diana De Simone
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(3) 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Imamura Vs Bissett Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Imamura are available here and Bissett photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
